The fabulous-yet-disturbing documentary, Terms and Conditions May Apply (recently screened at the Newport Beach Film Festival) explores this very concern as it highlights the resistance of some websites to safeguard our personal information. Much of the movie's wallop comes courtesy of interviews at the Electronic Frontier Foundation, a non-profit that fights for free speech, privacy, innovation, and consumer rights on the internet.
Latching onto the momentum of the movie, the EFF released its annual "Who Has Your Back?" report last week, which offers an in-depth look at the digital companies that protect your data from the government — and its findings may surprise you. Looking at the privacy policies of ISPs, email providers, cloud storage providers, social networking sites, and more, it's become clear that the "policies adopted by these corporations will have deep and lasting ramifications" on online consumer behavior.
Online Retailers and Social Media Outlets Ensure Some Privacy
Microsoft, Amazon, Comcast, and Google. Each company was evaluated in six different categories and graded with a star, or the lack of one. The EFF wanted to know whether these outlets told users about government data requests, required warrants for content, or fought for users' privacy rights in courts, among other factors.
It may be shocking to learn that giants such as Amazon, Apple, AT&T, and Verizon do virtually nothing to keep your information from federal prying and spying. In fact, Verizon happens to be the only company that makes no efforts whatsoever to safeguard data, the EFF report finds. Apple and AT&T only fight for privacy rights in Congress, and do nothing else. Yahoo — the other 1-star company in the report — only fights for users' privacy rights in courts. Faring slightly better than the others, Amazon commits to fighting for privacy rights in court and Congress, but doesn't include transparency of any kind for the consumer, and it doesn't force the government to acquire a warrant before accessing its users' data.
As far as security via social media and search engines go, the EFF found that consumers' privacy mostly depends on the outlet. Twitter and Sonic.net received six out of six stars for their protections; Google earned five stars out of six, and Facebook three, but the aforementioned Terms and Conditions documentary shows how these "free" services know much more about us than we might think — and can hold onto that information indefinitely.
When "Secure" Doesn't Mean "Private"
For example, Amazon has in its possession a wealth of data about its customers, especially those who use its increasingly convenient and robust cloud services. Noting that there's "plenty of room for improvement," the EFF says that though Amazon holds large quantities of information, it "does not promise to inform users when their data is sought by the government, produce annual transparency reports, or publish a law enforcement guide."
The EFF report brings up a salient caution that will never disappear: Consumers can't be too safe with their information in a non-secure environment. But despite consumer favorites like Amazon and Apple having scored relatively low in this year's EFF's investigation, there is a growing trend towards transparency and protecting consumer privacy in the digital age.